A Grammar of Yezin

Introduction

Scope and Purpose

This grammar provides a systematic description of the Yezin language (the 1135th one produced by the Language Creator), outlining its sound system, word formation and syntactic structure, with the aim of presenting a coherent account of the language as an integrated whole. Attention has been paid to both regular patterns and minor irregularities, as these together define the internal balance of the language.

The grammar is accompanied by a bilingual dictionary and a collection of illustrative texts, offering material for further study and comparison. The examples have been selected to demonstrate typical constructions and to give a sense of the language in extended use. The description is intended as a reference work for linguists and language enthusiasts alike, and as a foundation for any future research, teaching or creative adaptation of Yezin.

Typological Profile

It has has no interesting typological features.

Phonology

Phoneme Inventory

Consonants

Yezin has 19 consonant phonemes, a size that falls within a broadly average range.

It has a highly elaborate approximant system, a maximally contrastive voicing system, a complete absence of affricates and a strongly reduced sibilant system.

The table below presents the full inventory of consonant phonemes in Yezin. The chart lists all places and manners of articulation attested in the language.

labialalveolarlateralpalatalvelarglottal
stopp b d t k ɡ
nasalm n ɲ
trill/tap/flapr
fricativef s z h
approximantʋ l j

Vowels

Yezin has 5 vowel qualities. This places it within the broadly common range of mid-sized vowel inventories. The vowel chart shows the full set of contrasts employed in the language’s phonology.

It has a full range of vowel qualities even in reduced syllables.

The table below presents the full inventory of vowel phonemes in Yezin. The system comprises the distinct vowel qualities listed in the chart.

frontcentralback
closei u
mide o
opena

Stress and Tones

Yezin has neither phonemic stress nor lexical tone. Prosodic prominence and pitch variation are determined by pragmatic and discourse factors rather than by lexical contrasts.

Phonological Processes

Vowel Harmony

Vowel harmony does not exist in this language.

Writing System

Introduction

Yezin is normally written using the Latin alphabet, whose familiarity makes it straightforward for most readers. For clarity and precision, phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) are also provided throughout this grammar.

Orthography

Here are the various components of the orthography:

Simple letters

a /a/b /b/d /d/e /e/
f /f/g /ɡ/h /h/i /i/
j /j/k /k/l /l/m /m/
n /n/o /o/p /p/r /r/
s /s/t /t/u /u/w /ʋ/
z /z/ñ /ɲ/

Multi-letter combinations such as digraphs

ww /w/

Word Classes and Morphology

Number and Gender

Number

Yezin does not have grammatical number.

Gender

Yezin does not have genders or noun classes.

The Nominal Phrase

Nominal phrases in Yezin can be exemplified by the following example:

Hit pi nuskez hit higuj toww sal hij lis tuz sulof nokeñaz.

[hit pi nuskez hit hiɡuj tow sal hij lis tuz sulof nokeɲaz]

hit
the
pi
woman
nuskez
COMIT
hit
the
hiɡuj
knife
tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
hij
catch
lis
yon
tuz
three
sul
blind
-of
ACC
nokeɲaz
mouse

“The woman with the knife caught those three blind mice.”

(1)

In the following, we shall look at the various components in more details.

There are no clitics in the nominal phrase.

The Noun

The noun in Yezin stands alone without any prefixes or suffixes attached to it.

The noun displays the following derivational morphology: 11 prefixes, namely zi- /zi-/ ‘little’, re- /re-/ ‘big’, ñu- /ɲu-/ ‘old’, po- /po-/ ‘new’, pu- /pu-/ ‘good’, nu- /nu-/ ‘bad’, gi- /ɡi-/ ‘have’, ti- /ti-/ ‘use’, wo- /ʋo-/ ‘see’, pe- /pe-/ ‘make’ and to- /to-/ ‘break’

The Adjective

In Yezin, the adjective has the following structure: the root followed by an obligatory suffix expressing case, comprising -if /-if/ ‘NOM’, -of /-of/ ‘ACC’, -or /-or/ ‘GEN’, -os /-os/ ‘DAT’, -el /-el/ ‘INS’, -oww /-ow/ ‘VOC’, -ud /-ud/ ‘ALL’, -oh /-oh/ ‘LOC’, -ef /-ef/ ‘ABL’ and -us /-us/ ‘PART’.

Numerals

The numeral in Yezin stands alone without any prefixes or suffixes attached to it.

Determiners

The determiner in Yezin stands alone without any prefixes or suffixes attached to it.

Pronouns

The pronoun in Yezin stands alone without any prefixes or suffixes attached to it.

In Yezin, both subject and object pronouns are dropped unless they are stressed. Here is an example where neither of the pronouns are stressed:

Sal fan.

[sal fan]

sal
3.OBJ
fan
love

“He (the boy) loves her (the girl).”

(2)

But here, the word corresponding to he is stressed:

Sip sal fan.

[sip sal fan]

sip
3
sal
3.OBJ
fan
love

He loves her.”

(3)

And here, it is the one translated as her that is stressed:

Sal fan sip.

[sal fan sip]

sal
3.OBJ
fan
love
sip
3

“He loves her.”

(4)

Proper Nouns

Hit Wwapibak sal nijad hit Wusugok.

[hit wapibak sal nijad hit ʋusuɡok]

hit
the
wapibak
Wapibak
sal
3.OBJ
nijad
hate
hit
the
ʋusuɡok
Vusugok

“Wapibak hates Vusugok.”

(5)

Possession

hit fis hit wwewwilar

[hit fis hit wewilar]

hit
the
fis
boy
hit
the
wewilar
apple

“the boy’s apple”

(6)
sip hit wwewwilar

[sip hit wewilar]

sip
3
hit
the
wewilar
apple

“his (the boy’s) apple”

(7)
ges hit wwewwilar

[ɡes hit wewilar]

ɡes
1excl
hit
the
wewilar
apple

“my apple”

(8)
Hit womugus hit liz toww sal wwedis nuh hit wwopijus hit nik.

[hit ʋomuɡus hit liz tow sal wedis nuh hit wopijus hit nik]

hit
the
ʋomuɡus
hunter
hit
the
liz
daughter
tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
wedis
kiss
nuh
2
hit
the
wopijus
neighbour
hit
the
nik
son

“The hunter’s daughter kissed your neighbour’s son.”

(9)

Derivation

mefomuww

[mefomuw]

mefomuw
lamb

“a lamb”

(10)
zimefomuww

[zimefomuw]

zi-
little
mefomuw
lamb

“a little lamb”

(11)
Toww gizimefomuww.

[tow ɡizimefomuw]

tow
PAST
ɡi-
have
zi-
little
mefomuw
lamb

“She had a little lamb.”

(12)

This doesn’t affect all adjectives and verbs. Compare, for instance the previous example with this one, where black and love do not undergo affixation:

Toww sal fan gipof mefomuww.

[tow sal fan ɡipof mefomuw]

tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
fan
love
ɡip
black
-of
ACC
mefomuw
lamb

“She loved a black lamb.”

(13)

Compounding

Verbs

Inflectional Categories

The verbal phrase clitics in Yezin fall into two categories, proclitics and enclitics: first, a clitic expressing question, comprising sut /sut/ ‘Q’; second, a clitic expressing obj, comprising ha /ha/ ‘1incl’, hoz /hoz/ ‘1excl’, nel /nel/ ‘2’ and sal /sal/ ‘3’; third, a clitic expressing voice, comprising wip /ʋip/ ‘passive’; fourth, a clitic expressing mode, comprising bil /bil/ ‘imperative’, fek /fek/ ‘conditional’ and baf /baf/ ‘optative’; fifth, a clitic expressing ta, comprising toww /tow/ ‘PAST’; sixth, a clitic expressing negation, comprising mu /mu/ ‘NEG’; and finally, seventh, a clitic expressing indobj, comprising lij /lij/ ‘1incl’, gub /ɡub/ ‘1excl’, geg /ɡeɡ/ ‘2’ and sel /sel/ ‘3’.

In addition, the verb is structured like this: the root followed by an optional suffix expressing subj, comprising -op /-op/ ‘1incl’, -ek /-ek/ ‘1excl’ and -uk /-uk/ ‘2’.

The verb displays the following derivational morphology: five prefixes, namely ho- /ho-/ ‘begin’, mi- /mi-/ ‘stop’, na- /na-/ ‘continue’, sa- /sa-/ ‘try’ and bi- /bi-/ ‘start’

Nel fanek.

[nel fanek]

nel
2.OBJ
fan
love
-ek
1excl.SUBJ

“I love you.”

(14)

Adverbs Minor Classes

Adpositions

There is one type of clitic in the adpositional phrase, namely an enclitic (placed finally), expressing root.

doh hit gejed niw

[doh hit ɡejed niʋ]

doh
in
hit
the
ɡejed
table
niʋ
surface

“on the table”

(15)
bes hit gañawwin wwih

[bes hit ɡaɲawin wih]

bes
to
hit
the
ɡaɲawin
box
wih
inside

“into the box”

(16)
nuskez ges

[nuskez ɡes]

nuskez
COMIT
ɡes
1excl

“with me”

(17)

Syntax

Basic Clause Structure

Constituent Order

Constituent order describes the typical arrangement of the subject (S), verb (V) and object (O) in simple declarative clauses. It is a fundamental parameter in grammatical description and forms one of the clearest ways of characterising the overall structure of a language’s clause system.

Yezin employs Subject–Verb–Object (SVO) as its basic word order. The subject is followed by the verb, with the object occurring in post-verbal position. This ordering is widely attested across the world’s languages.

The following examples illustrate the basic, unmarked, constituent order in Yezin.

Hit datibaf toww sal fal hit womugus.

[hit datibaf tow sal fal hit ʋomuɡus]

hit
the
datibaf
jaguar
tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
fal
kill
hit
the
ʋomuɡus
hunter

“The jaguar killed the hunter.”

(18)
Hit toduhuk toww sal mem hit womugus hit liz hit kuj.

[hit toduhuk tow sal mem hit ʋomuɡus hit liz hit kuj]

hit
the
toduhuk
lion
tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
mem
eat
hit
the
ʋomuɡus
hunter
hit
the
liz
daughter
hit
the
kuj
dog

“The lion ate the hunter’s daughter’s dog.”

(19)

The language has a fixed constituent order, and major phrases normally appear in a predictable position in the clause. Movement for discourse reasons is highly restricted: topics and foci are expressed not by rearranging elements, but through dedicated constructions such as clefts, focus clauses or topic–comment frames. Constituents remain continuous, and both the relative order of phrases and the internal structure of each phrase are stable. As a result, significant deviations from the basic word order are ungrammatical, and discourse structure is managed through these specialised constructions rather than through word-order variation.

Noun Phrases

Structure and Order

The internal structure of noun phrases in Yezin reveals typologically significant preferences in the ordering of nominal constituents. This includes the position of adjectives, numerals, and possessors relative to the noun, each of which can offer clues to the overall headedness of the language.

Possessive constructions are head-final: the possessor precedes the possessed noun. For example, Yezin expresses “the child’s toy” with the equivalent of “child toy”. This ordering is found in many SOV and postpositional languages and aligns with a broader tendency towards modifier-first structures.

nuh hit nik hit kin hit buk

[nuh hit nik hit kin hit buk]

nuh
2
hit
the
nik
son
hit
the
kin
friend
hit
the
buk
book

“your son’s friend’s book”

(20)

Case Marking

Yezin uses nominative–accusative case marking. The subject of an intransitive verb and the subject of a transitive verb are treated alike and take the nominative case, while the object of a transitive verb is marked with the accusative case. This is the familiar pattern from many European languages: the grammar groups together the participants that function as subjects and marks the participant affected by a transitive action separately.

Hit det tud.

[hit det tud]

hit
the
det
cat
tud
sleep

“The cat is sleeping.”

(21)
Hit det siñ.

[hit det siɲ]

hit
the
det
cat
siɲ
run

“The cat is running.”

(22)
Hit det sal berel hit nokeñaz.

[hit det sal berel hit nokeɲaz]

hit
the
det
cat
sal
3.OBJ
berel
chase
hit
the
nokeɲaz
mouse

“The cat is chasing the mouse.”

(23)
Hit det toww sal hij hit nokeñaz.

[hit det tow sal hij hit nokeɲaz]

hit
the
det
cat
tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
hij
catch
hit
the
nokeɲaz
mouse

“The cat caught the mouse.”

(24)

Conjunctions

Here is an example of a conjunction.

Hit womugus toww sal fal hit datibaf rum hit jefadar rum hit toduhuk.

[hit ʋomuɡus tow sal fal hit datibaf rum hit jefadar rum hit toduhuk]

hit
the
ʋomuɡus
hunter
tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
fal
kill
hit
the
datibaf
jaguar
rum
and
hit
the
jefadar
tiger
rum
and
hit
the
toduhuk
lion

“The hunter killed the jaguars, the tigers and the lions.”

(25)

Modifiers and Determiners

The ordering of demonstratives, articles (if present), and other modifiers in Yezin provides further insight into the structure of the noun phrase. These elements frequently exhibit fixed positions and may reveal whether the language favours head-initial or head-final patterns.

Complex Sentences

Relative Clauses

Yezin forms relative clauses by placing the relative clause after the noun it modifies. The clause follows the internal word order of ordinary finite clauses. A dedicated relativising marker introduces the clause and identifies the relationship between the head noun and its role inside the relative clause.

To illustrate how relative clauses work, let us begin with a simple sentence:

Toww sal liwwohek hit det.

[tow sal liwohek hit det]

tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
liwoh
pat
-ek
1excl.SUBJ
hit
the
det
cat

“I patted the cat.”

(26)

We can now add a relative clause modifying the noun:

Toww liwwohek hit det, nan toww sal hij hit nokeñaz.

[tow liwohek hit det, nan tow sal hij hit nokeɲaz]

tow
PAST
liwoh
pat
-ek
1excl.SUBJ
hit
the
det
cat
nan
RELPRON
tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
hij
catch
hit
the
nokeɲaz
mouse

“I patted the cat that caught the mouse.”

(27)

Relative clauses may themselves contain other relative clauses:

Toww liwwohek hit det, nan toww hij hit nokeñaz, nan toww sal mem hit wusiski.

[tow liwohek hit det, nan tow hij hit nokeɲaz, nan tow sal mem hit ʋusiski]

tow
PAST
liwoh
pat
-ek
1excl.SUBJ
hit
the
det
cat
nan
RELPRON
tow
PAST
hij
catch
hit
the
nokeɲaz
mouse
nan
RELPRON
tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
mem
eat
hit
the
ʋusiski
cheese

“I patted the cat that caught the mouse that ate the cheese.”

(28)

Finally, here is an example containing several layers of embedding:

Toww liwwohek hit det, nan toww hij hit nokeñaz, nan toww mem hit wusiski, nan toww sal nazek ges.

[tow liwohek hit det, nan tow hij hit nokeɲaz, nan tow mem hit ʋusiski, nan tow sal nazek ɡes]

tow
PAST
liwoh
pat
-ek
1excl.SUBJ
hit
the
det
cat
nan
RELPRON
tow
PAST
hij
catch
hit
the
nokeɲaz
mouse
nan
RELPRON
tow
PAST
mem
eat
hit
the
ʋusiski
cheese
nan
RELPRON
tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
naz
buy
-ek
1excl.SUBJ
ɡes
1excl

“I patted the cat that caught the mouse that ate the cheese that I bought.”

(29)

Complementation Strategies

Yezin forms complement clauses by nominalising the embedded verb. The nominalised form lacks finite verbal categories and behaves as a noun phrase. Subjects of nominalised clauses occur in the genitive case, and the nominalised verb establishes the semantic content of the complement.

The following example illustrate how complement clauses function:

Hit fis toww sal siw sel hit nef wwewwilar toww ponip sel hit tedisel.

[hit fis tow sal siʋ sel hit nef wewilar tow ponip sel hit tedisel]

hit
the
fis
boy
tow
PAST
sal
3.OBJ
siʋ
give
sel
3.INDOBJ
hit
the
nef
girl
wewilar
apple
tow
PAST
ponip
surprise
sel
3.INDOBJ
hit
the
tedisel
teacher

“It surprised the teacher that the boy had given the girl an apple.”

(30)

Quotes

Yezin expresses quoted or reported speech without a dedicated quotative particle. Quotations appear as ordinary clauses, distinguished only by the surrounding syntactic context or by the use of verbs of speaking.

Here is an example of how quotations are expressed:

Hit fis toww hoz den sel hit nef ges nel fan nuh.

[hit fis tow hoz den sel hit nef ɡes nel fan nuh]

hit
the
fis
boy
tow
PAST
hoz
1excl.OBJ
den
tell
sel
3.INDOBJ
hit
the
nef
girl
ɡes
1excl
nel
2.OBJ
fan
love
nuh
2

“The boy told the girl that he loved her.”

(31)

How to cite this grammar

Language Creator. 2026. A Grammar of Yezin. Generated by the Language Creator, version 0.92, on 15 August 2026. https://languagecreator.org/grammar/1QAJD

In BibTeX format:

@misc{LC-1QAJD,
  year         = 2026,
  author       = {{Language Creator}},
  title        = {A Grammar of {Yezin}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://languagecreator.org/grammar/1QAJD}},
  note         = {Generated by the Language Creator, version 0.92, on 15 August 2026}
}

Supplementary Materials

A collection of illustrative texts and a bilingual dictionary (English–Yezin / Yezin–English) accompany this grammar. The complete work – comprising the grammar, dictionary and texts – may also be downloaded in ODT or DOCX format.

Readers are encouraged to share observations or corrections via the feedback form. The present page may be accessed directly at:

https://languagecreator.org/grammar/1QAJD

Behind the scenes, the Language Creator stores the generated language in a JSON-based format known as ELD. The corresponding ELD file may be downloaded, edited as required, and reuploaded in order to regenerate the grammar, dictionary and texts.

To revisit the questionnaire settings used to generate this language, .

Language creation took 0.03 seconds; writing the grammar 0.06 seconds.