A Grammar of Kap

Introduction

Scope and Purpose

This grammar provides a systematic description of the Kap language (the 2037th one produced by the Language Creator), outlining its sound system, word formation and syntactic structure, with the aim of presenting a coherent account of the language as an integrated whole. Attention has been paid to both regular patterns and minor irregularities, as these together define the internal balance of the language.

The grammar is accompanied by a bilingual dictionary and a collection of illustrative texts, offering material for further study and comparison. The examples have been selected to demonstrate typical constructions and to give a sense of the language in extended use. The description is intended as a reference work for linguists and language enthusiasts alike, and as a foundation for any future research, teaching or creative adaptation of Kap.

Typological Profile

It has the VSO basic order, common globally but unusual in many families and postpositions.

Phonology

Phoneme Inventory

Consonants

Kap has 19 consonant phonemes, a size that falls within a broadly average range.

It has a complete absence of affricates, a broad set of voiced–voiceless oppositions and no glottal consonants at all.

The table below presents the full inventory of consonant phonemes in Kap. The chart lists all places and manners of articulation attested in the language.

labialalveolarlateralpalatalvelaruvular
stopp b d t k ɡ q
aspirated stoppʰ kʰ
nasalm n
trill/tap/flapr
fricativef s z
approximantw l j

Vowels

Kap has 11 vowel qualities, forming a relatively large inventory. The system distinguishes several vowel categories, as indicated in the chart, offering a wide range of vocalic contrasts.

It has a fully developed system of nasal vowels matching the oral height distinctions, a partially contrastive system of vowel length and occasional ghost vowels that surface only weakly.

The table below presents the full inventory of vowel phonemes in Kap. The system comprises the distinct vowel qualities listed in the chart.

frontcentralback
closei ĩ u ũ
mide ə̃ o
opena ã

Stress and Tones

Kap has neither phonemic stress nor lexical tone. Prosodic prominence and pitch variation are determined by pragmatic and discourse factors rather than by lexical contrasts.

Phonological Processes

Vowel Harmony

Vowel harmony does not exist in this language.

Writing System

Introduction

Kap is normally written using the Latin alphabet, whose familiarity makes it straightforward for most readers. For clarity and precision, phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) are also provided throughout this grammar.

Orthography

Here are the various components of the orthography:

Simple letters

a /a/b /b/d /d/e /e/
f /f/g /ɡ/i /i/j /j/
k /k/l /l/m /m/n /n/
o /o/p /p/q /q/r /r/
s /s/t /t/u /u/w /w/
z /z/ẽ /ə̃/

Multi-letter combinations such as digraphs

aa /aː/ai /ai/an /ã/
anan /ãː/au /au/ee /eː/
ii /iː/in /ĩ/inin /ĩː/
kh /kʰ/oo /oː/ph /pʰ/
un /ũ/unun /ũː/uu /uː/

Word Classes and Morphology

Number and Gender

Number

Kap distinguishes singular and plural.

Gender

Kap does not have genders or noun classes.

The Nominal Phrase

Nominal phrases in Kap can be exemplified by the following example:

Fekhananẽf bafukipẽf phajẽful pigẽful nepul dunn mank.

[fekʰananə̃f bafukipə̃f pʰajə̃ful piɡə̃ful nepul dũn mãk]

f-
PRES
ekʰ
blind
-an
3.plur.SUBJ
-an
none.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
b-
PAST
af
catch
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ip
3.plur.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
pʰaj
woman
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
piɡ
knife
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
nepul
COMIT
dũn
3.plur
mãk
then

“The woman with the knife caught those three blind mice.”

In the following, we shall look at the various components in more details.

There are no clitics in the nominal phrase.

The Noun

The noun in Kap consists of first, the root; second, an optional suffix expressing number, comprising -al /-al/ ‘plur’; third, an obligatory suffix expressing possessor, comprising -er /-er/ ‘1incl.sing’, -an /-an/ ‘1excl.sing’, -ẽp /-ə#p/ ‘2.sing’, -in /-in/ ‘3.sing’, -ad /-ad/ ‘1incl.plur’, -ẽn /-ə#n/ ‘1excl.plur’, -om /-om/ ‘2.plur’, -et /-et/ ‘3.plur’ and -ẽf /-ə#f/ ‘no.owner’; fourth, an optional suffix expressing def, comprising -ul /-ul/ ‘def’; and finally, fifth, an optional suffix expressing case, comprising -es /-es/ ‘ACC’, -at /-at/ ‘GEN’, -up /-up/ ‘DAT’, -ow /-ow/ ‘INS’, -iw /-iw/ ‘VOC’, -em /-em/ ‘ALL’, -ij /-ij/ ‘LOC’, -o /-o/ ‘ABL’ and -ak /-ak/ ‘PART’.

The Adjective

The adjective in Kap stands alone without any prefixes or suffixes attached to it.

Numerals

The numeral in Kap stands alone without any prefixes or suffixes attached to it.

Determiners

In Kap, the determiner has the following structure: first, the root; second, an obligatory suffix expressing number, comprising -k /-k/ ‘sing’ and -f /-f/ ‘plur’; and finally, third, an obligatory suffix expressing case, comprising -af /-af/ ‘NOM’, -ef /-ef/ ‘ACC’, -ẽf /-ə#f/ ‘GEN’, -un /-un/ ‘DAT’, -if /-if/ ‘INS’, -aj /-aj/ ‘VOC’, -il /-il/ ‘ALL’, -ol /-ol/ ‘LOC’, -uq /-uq/ ‘ABL’ and -um /-um/ ‘PART’.

Pronouns

The pronoun in Kap stands alone without any prefixes or suffixes attached to it.

In Kap, subject pronouns (but not object pronouns ones) are dropped unless they are stressed. Here is an example where neither of the pronouns are stressed:

Fisukẽkẽf nanann.

[fisukə̃kə̃f nãːn]

f-
PRES
is
love
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
nãːn
3.sing

“He (the boy) loves her (the girl).”

But here, the word corresponding to he (i.e., the subject) is stressed:

Fisukẽkẽf nanann nanann.

[fisukə̃kə̃f nãːn nãːn]

f-
PRES
is
love
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
nãːn
3.sing
nãːn
3.sing

“He loves her.”

Proper Nouns

Fikhogukẽkẽf Phonibẽful Peminrẽfules.

[fikʰoɡukə̃kə̃f pʰonibə̃ful pemĩrə̃fules]

f-
PRES
ikʰoɡ
hate
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
pʰonib
Ponib
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
pemĩr
Pemir
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC

“Ponib hates Pemir.”

Possession

linoqinul gukẽfulat

[linoqinul ɡukə̃fulat]

linoq
apple
-in
3.sing.POSS
-ul
def
ɡuk
boy
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-at
GEN

“the boy’s apple”

linoqinul nanann

[linoqinul nãːn]

linoq
apple
-in
3.sing.POSS
-ul
def
nãːn
3.sing

“his (the boy’s) apple”

linoqanul

[linoqanul]

linoq
apple
-an
1excl.sing.POSS
-ul
def

“my apple”

Baumugukẽkẽf miininul foniifẽfulat weerinules tifanandẽpulat.

[baumuɡukə̃kə̃f miːninul foniːfə̃fulat weːrinules tifãːdə̃pulat]

b-
PAST
aumuɡ
kiss
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
miːn
daughter
-in
3.sing.POSS
-ul
def
foniːf
hunter
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-at
GEN
weːr
son
-in
3.sing.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC
tifãːd
neighbour
-ə̃p
2.sing.POSS
-ul
def
-at
GEN

“The hunter’s daughter kissed your neighbour’s son.”

Derivation

Kap has no derivational processes.

daukaf fikhimẽf

[daukaf fikʰimə̃f]

dau
a
-k
sing
-af
NOM
fikʰim
lamb
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS

“a lamb”

Note how none show up here:

Fanjukanẽf boorukẽkẽf bidukẽkẽf daukef nanann mank.

[fãjukanə̃f boːrukə̃kə̃f bidukə̃kə̃f daukef nãːn mãk]

f-
PRES
ãj
little
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-an
none.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
b-
PAST
oːr
want
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
b-
PAST
id
have
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
dau
a
-k
sing
-ef
ACC
nãːn
3.sing
mãk
then

“She wanted to have a little lamb.”

Compounding

Verbs

Inflectional Categories

There are no clitics in the verbal phrase.

In addition, the verb is structured like this: first, an optional prefix expressing negation, comprising lo- /lo-/ ‘NEG’; second, an obligatory prefix expressing ta, comprising f- /f-/ ‘PRES’ and b- /b-/ ‘PAST’; third, the root; fourth, an optional suffix expressing mode, comprising -oq /-oq/ ‘imperative’, -ut /-ut/ ‘conditional’ and -am /-am/ ‘optative’; fifth, an optional suffix expressing voice, comprising -ikh /-ikʰ/ ‘passive’; sixth, an obligatory suffix expressing subj, comprising -ẽk /-ə#k/ ‘1incl.sing’, -ot /-ot/ ‘1excl.sing’, -uf /-uf/ ‘2.sing’, -uk /-uk/ ‘3.sing’, -ur /-ur/ ‘1incl.plur’, -ẽl /-ə#l/ ‘1excl.plur’, -er /-er/ ‘2.plur’ and -an /-an/ ‘3.plur’; seventh, an obligatory suffix expressing obj, comprising -an /-an/ ‘none’, -uw /-uw/ ‘1incl.sing’, -im /-im/ ‘1excl.sing’, -id /-id/ ‘2.sing’, -ẽk /-ə#k/ ‘3.sing’, -ad /-ad/ ‘1incl.plur’, -akh /-akʰ/ ‘1excl.plur’, -as /-as/ ‘2.plur’ and -ip /-ip/ ‘3.plur’; eighth, an optional suffix expressing indobj, comprising -ẽd /-ə#d/ ‘1incl.sing’, -ẽph /-ə#pʰ/ ‘1excl.sing’, -ub /-ub/ ‘2.sing’, -ir /-ir/ ‘3.sing’, -aw /-aw/ ‘1incl.plur’, -ap /-ap/ ‘1excl.plur’, -eb /-eb/ ‘2.plur’ and -ed /-ed/ ‘3.plur’; and finally, ninth, an obligatory suffix expressing question, comprising -uf /-uf/ ‘Q’ and -ẽf /-ə#f/ ‘not.Q’.

Fisotidẽf sinw.

[fisotidə̃f sĩw]

f-
PRES
is
love
-ot
1excl.sing.SUBJ
-id
2.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
sĩw
2.sing

“I love you.”

Adverbs Minor Classes

Adpositions

There is one type of clitic in the adpositional phrase, namely an enclitic (placed finally), expressing root.

nebẽful koot

[nebə̃ful koːt]

neb
table
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
koːt
in_surface

“on the table”

phuzanrẽful muf

[pʰuzãrə̃ful muf]

pʰuzãr
box
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
muf
to_inside

“into the box”

pam nepul

[pam nepul]

pam
1excl.sing
nepul
COMIT

“with me”

Syntax

Basic Clause Structure

Constituent Order

Constituent order describes the typical arrangement of the subject (S), verb (V) and object (O) in simple declarative clauses. It is a fundamental parameter in grammatical description and forms one of the clearest ways of characterising the overall structure of a language’s clause system.

The basic constituent order of Kap is Verb–Subject–Object (VSO). Clauses begin with the verb, followed by the subject, with the object in final position. This pattern is attested among various verb-initial languages.

The following examples illustrate the basic, unmarked, constituent order in Kap.

Bomukẽkẽf tewaqẽful foniifẽfules.

[bomukə̃kə̃f tewaqə̃ful foniːfə̃fules]

b-
PAST
om
kill
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
tewaq
jaguar
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
foniːf
hunter
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC

“The jaguar killed the hunter.”

Bodukẽkẽf tuwookẽful tununbinules miininulat foniifẽfulat.

[bodukə̃kə̃f tuwoːkə̃ful tũːbinules miːninulat foniːfə̃fulat]

b-
PAST
od
eat
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
tuwoːk
lion
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
tũːb
dog
-in
3.sing.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC
miːn
daughter
-in
3.sing.POSS
-ul
def
-at
GEN
foniːf
hunter
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-at
GEN

“The lion ate the hunter’s daughter’s dog.”

The language has a fixed constituent order, and major phrases normally appear in a predictable position in the clause. Movement for discourse reasons is highly restricted: topics and foci are expressed not by rearranging elements, but through dedicated constructions such as clefts, focus clauses or topic–comment frames. Constituents remain continuous, and both the relative order of phrases and the internal structure of each phrase are stable. As a result, significant deviations from the basic word order are ungrammatical, and discourse structure is managed through these specialised constructions rather than through word-order variation.

Noun Phrases

Structure and Order

The internal structure of noun phrases in Kap reveals typologically significant preferences in the ordering of nominal constituents. This includes the position of adjectives, numerals, and possessors relative to the noun, each of which can offer clues to the overall headedness of the language.

Possessive constructions are head-initial: the possessed noun precedes the possessor. For instance, Kap expresses “the child’s toy” with the equivalent of “toy child”. This structure is typologically rarer and often co-occurs with verb-initial syntax or with grammatical marking on the noun.

lifeezinul nuuginulat weerẽpulat

[lifeːzinul nuːɡinulat weːrə̃pulat]

lifeːz
book
-in
3.sing.POSS
-ul
def
nuːɡ
friend
-in
3.sing.POSS
-ul
def
-at
GEN
weːr
son
-ə̃p
2.sing.POSS
-ul
def
-at
GEN

“your son’s friend’s book”

Case Marking

Kap uses nominative–accusative case marking. The subject of an intransitive verb and the subject of a transitive verb are treated alike and take the nominative case, while the object of a transitive verb is marked with the accusative case. This is the familiar pattern from many European languages: the grammar groups together the participants that function as subjects and marks the participant affected by a transitive action separately.

Faqukanẽf luphẽful.

[faqukanə̃f lupʰə̃ful]

f-
PRES
aq
sleep
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-an
none.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
lupʰ
cat
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def

“The cat is sleeping.”

Fuuphukanẽf luphẽful.

[fuːpʰukanə̃f lupʰə̃ful]

f-
PRES
uːpʰ
run
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-an
none.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
lupʰ
cat
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def

“The cat is running.”

Faaphotukẽkẽf luphẽful kurananmẽfules.

[faːpʰotukə̃kə̃f lupʰə̃ful kurãːmə̃fules]

f-
PRES
aːpʰot
chase
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
lupʰ
cat
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
kurãːm
mouse
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC

“The cat is chasing the mouse.”

Bafukẽkẽf luphẽful kurananmẽfules.

[bafukə̃kə̃f lupʰə̃ful kurãːmə̃fules]

b-
PAST
af
catch
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
lupʰ
cat
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
kurãːm
mouse
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC

“The cat caught the mouse.”

Conjunctions

Here is an example of a conjunction.

Bomukipẽf foniifẽful tewaqalẽfules dig ladikalẽfules dig tuwookalẽfules.

[bomukipə̃f foniːfə̃ful tewaqalə̃fules diɡ ladikalə̃fules diɡ tuwoːkalə̃fules]

b-
PAST
om
kill
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ip
3.plur.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
foniːf
hunter
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
tewaq
jaguar
-al
plur
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC
diɡ
and
ladik
tiger
-al
plur
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC
diɡ
and
tuwoːk
lion
-al
plur
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC

“The hunter killed the jaguars, the tigers and the lions.”

Modifiers and Determiners

The ordering of demonstratives, articles (if present), and other modifiers in Kap provides further insight into the structure of the noun phrase. These elements frequently exhibit fixed positions and may reveal whether the language favours head-initial or head-final patterns.

Complex Sentences

Relative Clauses

Kap uses the correlative strategy to form relative clauses. The relative clause is introduced by a dedicated relativiser and appears as an independent clause. The main clause contains a demonstrative that corresponds to the relativiser and identifies the element being modified. The relative clause precedes the main clause when used on its own, and follows the head noun when it functions as a modifier. The internal structure of both clauses is fully finite.

To illustrate how relative clauses work, let us begin with a simple sentence:

Bausitotẽkẽf luphẽfules.

[bausitotə̃kə̃f lupʰə̃fules]

b-
PAST
ausit
pat
-ot
1excl.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
lupʰ
cat
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC

“I patted the cat.”

We can now add a relative clause modifying the noun:

Bafukẽkẽf kurananmẽfules bausitotẽkẽf nanann mank.

[bafukə̃kə̃f kurãːmə̃fules bausitotə̃kə̃f nãːn mãk]

b-
PAST
af
catch
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
kurãːm
mouse
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC
b-
PAST
ausit
pat
-ot
1excl.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
nãːn
3.sing
mãk
then

“I patted the cat that caught the mouse.”

Relative clauses may themselves contain other relative clauses:

Bodukẽkẽf poziilẽfules bafukẽkẽf nanann mank bausitotẽkẽf nanann mank.

[bodukə̃kə̃f poziːlə̃fules bafukə̃kə̃f nãːn mãk bausitotə̃kə̃f nãːn mãk]

b-
PAST
od
eat
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
poziːl
cheese
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-es
ACC
b-
PAST
af
catch
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
nãːn
3.sing
mãk
then
b-
PAST
ausit
pat
-ot
1excl.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
nãːn
3.sing
mãk
then

“I patted the cat that caught the mouse that ate the cheese.”

Finally, here is an example containing several layers of embedding:

Baagotẽkẽf nanann bodukẽkẽf nanann mank bafukẽkẽf nanann mank bausitotẽkẽf nanann mank.

[baːɡotə̃kə̃f nãːn bodukə̃kə̃f nãːn mãk bafukə̃kə̃f nãːn mãk bausitotə̃kə̃f nãːn mãk]

b-
PAST
aːɡ
buy
-ot
1excl.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
nãːn
3.sing
b-
PAST
od
eat
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
nãːn
3.sing
mãk
then
b-
PAST
af
catch
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
nãːn
3.sing
mãk
then
b-
PAST
ausit
pat
-ot
1excl.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
nãːn
3.sing
mãk
then

“I patted the cat that caught the mouse that ate the cheese that I bought.”

Complementation Strategies

Kap forms complement clauses by nominalising the embedded verb. The nominalised form lacks finite verbal categories and behaves as a noun phrase. Subjects of nominalised clauses occur in the genitive case, and the nominalised verb establishes the semantic content of the complement.

The following example illustrate how complement clauses function:

Basasukanirẽf biigukẽkirẽf daukef linoqẽfes phulẽfulup gukinul fə̃seezẽfulup.

[basasukanirə̃f biːɡukə̃kirə̃f daukef linoqə̃fes pʰulə̃fulup ɡukinul fə̃seːzə̃fulup]

b-
PAST
asas
surprise
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-an
none.OBJ
-ir
3.sing.INDOBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
b-
PAST
iːɡ
give
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-ə̃k
3.sing.OBJ
-ir
3.sing.INDOBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
dau
a
-k
sing
-ef
ACC
linoq
apple
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-es
ACC
pʰul
girl
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-up
DAT
ɡuk
boy
-in
3.sing.POSS
-ul
def
fə̃seːz
teacher
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-up
DAT

“It surprised the teacher that the boy had given the girl an apple.”

Quotes

Kap expresses quoted or reported speech without a dedicated quotative particle. Quotations appear as ordinary clauses, distinguished only by the surrounding syntactic context or by the use of verbs of speaking.

Here is an example of how quotations are expressed:

Baanukimirẽf gukẽful fisukidẽf sinw pam phulẽfulup.

[baːnukimirə̃f ɡukə̃ful fisukidə̃f sĩw pam pʰulə̃fulup]

b-
PAST
aːn
tell
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-im
1excl.sing.OBJ
-ir
3.sing.INDOBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
ɡuk
boy
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
f-
PRES
is
love
-uk
3.sing.SUBJ
-id
2.sing.OBJ
-ə̃f
not.Q
sĩw
2.sing
pam
1excl.sing
pʰul
girl
-ə̃f
no.owner.POSS
-ul
def
-up
DAT

“The boy told the girl that he loved her.”

How to cite this grammar

Language Creator. 2026. A Grammar of Kap. Generated by the Language Creator, version 0.93, on 10 November 2026. https://languagecreator.org/grammar/721JT

In BibTeX format:

@misc{LC-721JT,
  year         = 2026,
  author       = {{Language Creator}},
  title        = {A Grammar of {Kap}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://languagecreator.org/grammar/721JT}},
  note         = {Generated by the Language Creator, version 0.93, on 10 November 2026}
}

Supplementary Materials

A collection of illustrative texts and a bilingual dictionary (English–Kap / Kap–English) accompany this grammar. The complete work – comprising the grammar, dictionary and texts – may also be downloaded in ODT or DOCX format.

Readers are encouraged to share observations or corrections via the feedback form. The present page may be accessed directly at:

https://languagecreator.org/grammar/721JT

Behind the scenes, the Language Creator stores the generated language in an editable format known as ELD. The corresponding ELD file may be downloaded, edited as required, and reuploaded in order to regenerate the grammar, dictionary and texts.

To revisit the questionnaire settings used to generate this language, .

Language creation took 0.03 seconds; writing the grammar 0.06 seconds.