The Language Creator
– from linguistic questionnaire to grammar, lexicon and texts.

A Grammar of Yof

Introduction

Scope and Purpose

This grammar provides a systematic description of the Yof language (the 1102nd one produced by the Language Creator), outlining its sound system, word formation and syntactic structure, with the aim of presenting a coherent account of the language as an integrated whole. Attention has been paid to both regular patterns and minor irregularities, as these together define the internal balance of the language.

The grammar is accompanied by a bilingual dictionary and a collection of illustrative texts, offering material for further study and comparison. The examples have been selected to demonstrate typical constructions and to give a sense of the language in extended use. The description is intended as a reference work for linguists and language enthusiasts alike, and as a foundation for any future research, teaching or creative adaptation of Yof.

Typological Profile

It has has no interesting typological features.

Phonology

Phoneme Inventory

Consonants

Yof has 25 consonant phonemes, a size that falls within a broadly average range.

It has an extensive set of dental articulations.

The table below presents the full inventory of consonant phonemes in Yof. The chart lists all places and manners of articulation attested in the language.

labialalveolarpostalveolarlateralpalatalvelarlab. velarglottal
stopp b d t k ɡ kʷ ɡʷ ʔ
nasalm n ɲ ŋ ŋʷ
trill/tap/flapr
fricativef s ʃ h
approximantw l j
affricatet͡s t͡ʃ

Vowels

Yof has 9 vowel qualities, forming a relatively large inventory. The system distinguishes several vowel categories, as indicated in the chart, offering a wide range of vocalic contrasts.

It has a modest but genuine inventory of nasal vowels, a partially contrastive system of vowel length, occasional ghost vowels that surface only weakly and a moderately reduced system of unstressed vowels.

The table below presents the full inventory of vowel phonemes in Yof. The system comprises the distinct vowel qualities listed in the chart.

frontcentralback
closei u
mide ə̃ o
opena

Stress and Tones

Yof has neither phonemic stress nor lexical tone. Prosodic prominence and pitch variation are determined by pragmatic and discourse factors rather than by lexical contrasts.

Phonological Processes

Vowel Harmony

Vowel harmony does not exist in this language.

Writing System

Introduction

Yof is normally written using the Latin alphabet, whose familiarity makes it straightforward for most readers. For clarity and precision, phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) are also provided throughout this grammar.

Orthography

Here are the various components of the orthography:

Simple letters

a /a/b /b/d /d/e /e/
f /f/g /ɡ/h /h/i /i/
j /j/k /k/l /l/m /m/
n /n/o /o/p /p/q /ʔ/
r /r/s /s/t /t/u /u/
w /w/ñ /ɲ/ẽ /ə̃/

Multi-letter combinations such as digraphs

aa /aː/ai /ai/au /au/
ch /t͡ʃ/ee /eː/gw /ɡʷ/
ii /iː/ng /ŋ/ngw /ŋʷ/
oo /oː/qu /kʷ/sh /ʃ/
tz /t͡s/uu /uː/ɔi /ɔi/
ẽẽ /ə̃ː/

Word Classes and Morphology

Number and Gender

Number

Yof does not have grammatical number.

Gender

Yof has the following genders:

Gender masc – for instance: bach ‘land’, changwosh ‘root’, chimiiq ‘forest’, disquoong ‘belly’, fibash ‘neighbour’, futziw ‘vagina’, gwaut ‘sea’, kit ‘table’, laab ‘skin’, lab ‘father’, pimep ‘bark’, qij ‘heart’, quik ‘colour’, ritaitz ‘apple’, sagij ‘horn’, shaad ‘year’, sheb ‘chair’, shipool ‘tower’, wɔil ‘friend’, ñiquach ‘anus’.

Gender fem – for instance: bagesh ‘faeces’, chichɔif ‘restaurant’, hulungw ‘bank’, katuus ‘market’, kuqẽẽst ‘salt’, lus ‘daughter’, mituub ‘umbrella’, mẽk ‘woman’, ngamɔis ‘breast’, ngish ‘girl’, ros ‘surface’, rẽñ ‘night’, shaskin ‘student’, shigw ‘north’, siquel ‘religion’, skaan ‘wind’, spafiiñ ‘knee’, tzij ‘name’, wing ‘knife’, ñeb ‘human being’.

The Nominal Phrase

Nominal phrases in Yof can be exemplified by the following example:

Dimẽkis ñiraur diwingis was gwongw changw ngiis him lutibibis.

[dimə̃kis ɲiraur diwiŋis was ɡʷoŋʷ t͡ʃaŋʷ ŋiːs him lutibibis]

d-
NOM i-
sing mə̃k
woman -is
def ɲiraur
COMIT d-
NOM i-
sing wiŋ
knife -is
def was
PAST ɡʷo
catch -ŋʷ
active t͡ʃ-
fem aŋʷ
yon ŋiːs
three him
blind l-
ACC u-
plur tibib
mouse -is
def

“The woman with the knife caught those three blind mice.”

 (1)

In the following, we shall look at the various components in more details.

There are no clitics in the nominal phrase.

The Noun

The noun in Yof consists of first, an obligatory prefix expressing case, comprising d- /d-/ ‘NOM’, l- /l-/ ‘ACC’, j- /j-/ ‘GEN’, m- /m-/ ‘DAT’, f- /f-/ ‘INS’, t- /t-/ ‘VOC’, p- /p-/ ‘ALL’, k- /k-/ ‘LOC’, r- /r-/ ‘ABL’ and qu- /kʷ-/ ‘PART’; second, an obligatory prefix expressing number, comprising i- /i-/ ‘sing’ and u- /u-/ ‘plur’; third, the root; and finally, fourth, an obligatory suffix expressing def, comprising -ingw /-iŋʷ/ ‘not.def’ and -is /-is/ ‘def’.

The noun displays the following derivational morphology: 11 suffixes, namely -iw /-iw/ ‘little’, -ir /-ir/ ‘big’, -al /-al/ ‘old’, -utz /-ut͡s/ ‘new’, -ig /-iɡ/ ‘good’, -aqu /-akʷ/ ‘bad’, -apa /-apa/ ‘have’, -uma /-uma/ ‘use’, -ufi /-ufi/ ‘see’, -utzu /-ut͡su/ ‘make’ and -angwi /-aŋʷi/ ‘break’

The Adjective

The adjective in Yof stands alone without any prefixes or suffixes attached to it.

Numerals

The numeral in Yof stands alone without any prefixes or suffixes attached to it.

Determiners

In Yof, the determiner has the following structure: an obligatory prefix expressing gender, comprising qu- /kʷ-/ ‘masc’ and ch- /t͡ʃ-/ ‘fem’ followed by the root.

Pronouns

The pronoun in Yof stands alone without any prefixes or suffixes attached to it.

In Yof, subject pronouns (but not object pronouns ones) are dropped unless they are stressed. Here is an example where neither of the pronouns are stressed:

Rongw pẽng.

[roŋʷ pə̃ŋ]

ro
love -ŋʷ
active pə̃ŋ
3.sing.fem

“He (the boy) loves her (the girl).”

 (2)

But here, the word corresponding to he (i.e., the subject) is stressed:

Hee rongw pẽng.

[heː roŋʷ pə̃ŋ]

heː
3.sing.masc ro
love -ŋʷ
active pə̃ŋ
3.sing.fem

“He loves her.”

 (3)

Proper Nouns

DiTitzẽqis kudiingw liFingwɔisis.

[ditit͡sə̃ʔis kudiːŋʷ lifiŋʷɔisis]

d-
NOM i-
sing tit͡sə̃ʔ
Titsa -is
def kudiː
hate -ŋʷ
active l-
ACC i-
sing fiŋʷɔis
Fingois -is
def

“Titsa hates Fingois.”

 (4)

Possession

jiboogis diritaitzis

[jiboːɡis diritait͡sis]

j-
GEN i-
sing boːɡ
boy -is
def d-
NOM i-
sing ritait͡s
apple -is
def

“the boy’s apple”

 (5)
hee diritaitzis

[heː diritait͡sis]

heː
3.sing.masc d-
NOM i-
sing ritait͡s
apple -is
def

“his (the boy’s) apple”

 (6)
daf diritaitzis

[daf diritait͡sis]

daf
1excl.sing d-
NOM i-
sing ritait͡s
apple -is
def

“my apple”

 (7)
Jifakagwis dilusis was hushangw jen jifibashis likiitis.

[jifakaɡʷis dilusis was huʃaŋʷ jen jifibaʃis likiːtis]

j-
GEN i-
sing fakaɡʷ
hunter -is
def d-
NOM i-
sing lus
daughter -is
def was
PAST huʃa
kiss -ŋʷ
active jen
2.sing j-
GEN i-
sing fibaʃ
neighbour -is
def l-
ACC i-
sing kiːt
son -is
def

“The hunter’s daughter kissed your neighbour’s son.”

 (8)

Derivation

chun difilemingw

[t͡ʃun difilemiŋʷ]

t͡ʃ-
fem un
a d-
NOM i-
sing filem
lamb -iŋʷ
not.def

“a lamb”

 (9)
chun difilemiwingw

[t͡ʃun difilemiwiŋʷ]

t͡ʃ-
fem un
a d-
NOM i-
sing filem
lamb -iw
little -iŋʷ
not.def

“a little lamb”

 (10)
Was chingw chun lifilemiwingw.

[was t͡ʃiŋʷ t͡ʃun lifilemiwiŋʷ]

was
PAST t͡ʃi
have -ŋʷ
active t͡ʃ-
fem un
a l-
ACC i-
sing filem
lamb -iw
little -iŋʷ
not.def

“She had a little lamb.”

 (11)

This doesn’t affect all adjectives and verbs. Compare, for instance the previous example with this one, where black and love do not undergo affixation:

Was rongw chun nas lifilemingw.

[was roŋʷ t͡ʃun nas lifilemiŋʷ]

was
PAST ro
love -ŋʷ
active t͡ʃ-
fem un
a nas
black l-
ACC i-
sing filem
lamb -iŋʷ
not.def

“She loved a black lamb.”

 (12)

Compounding

Verbs

Inflectional Categories

The verbal phrase clitics in Yof fall into two categories, proclitics and enclitics: first, a clitic expressing ta, comprising was /was/ ‘PAST’; second, a clitic expressing mode, comprising jas /jas/ ‘imperative’, tim /tim/ ‘conditional’ and lim /lim/ ‘optative’; third, a clitic expressing negation, comprising fur /fur/ ‘NEG’; and finally, fourth, a clitic expressing question, comprising gangw /ɡaŋʷ/ ‘Q’.

In addition, the verb is structured like this: the root followed by an obligatory suffix expressing voice, comprising -ngw /-ŋʷ/ ‘active’ and -r /-r/ ‘passive’.

The verb displays the following derivational morphology: five suffixes, namely -nga /-ŋa/ ‘begin’, -mi /-mi/ ‘stop’, -qua /-kʷa/ ‘continue’, -da /-da/ ‘try’ and -chi /-t͡ʃi/ ‘start’

Rongw jen.

[roŋʷ jen]

ro
love -ŋʷ
active jen
2.sing

“I love you.”

 (13)

Adverbs Minor Classes

Adpositions

There is one type of clitic in the adpositional phrase, namely an enclitic (placed finally), expressing root.

chim dikitis

[t͡ʃim dikitis]

t͡ʃim
in_surface d-
NOM i-
sing kit
table -is
def

“on the table”

 (14)
pin dirasaisis

[pin dirasaisis]

pin
to_inside d-
NOM i-
sing rasais
box -is
def

“into the box”

 (15)
ñiraur daf

[ɲiraur daf]

ɲiraur
COMIT daf
1excl.sing

“with me”

 (16)

Syntax

Basic Clause Structure

Constituent Order

Constituent order describes the typical arrangement of the subject (S), verb (V) and object (O) in simple declarative clauses. It is a fundamental parameter in grammatical description and forms one of the clearest ways of characterising the overall structure of a language’s clause system.

Yof employs Subject–Verb–Object (SVO) as its basic word order. The subject is followed by the verb, with the object occurring in post-verbal position. This ordering is widely attested across the world’s languages.

The following examples illustrate the basic, unmarked, constituent order in Yof.

Dipamichis was ngwingw lifakagwis.

[dipamit͡ʃis was ŋʷiŋʷ lifakaɡʷis]

d-
NOM i-
sing pamit͡ʃ
jaguar -is
def was
PAST ŋʷi
kill -ŋʷ
active l-
ACC i-
sing fakaɡʷ
hunter -is
def

“The jaguar killed the hunter.”

 (17)
Diqaquiijis was gwangw jifakagwis jilusis liqutis.

[diʔakʷiːjis was ɡʷaŋʷ jifakaɡʷis jilusis liʔutis]

d-
NOM i-
sing ʔakʷiːj
lion -is
def was
PAST ɡʷa
eat -ŋʷ
active j-
GEN i-
sing fakaɡʷ
hunter -is
def j-
GEN i-
sing lus
daughter -is
def l-
ACC i-
sing ʔut
dog -is
def

“The lion ate the hunter’s daughter’s dog.”

 (18)

The language has a fixed constituent order, and major phrases normally appear in a predictable position in the clause. Movement for discourse reasons is highly restricted: topics and foci are expressed not by rearranging elements, but through dedicated constructions such as clefts, focus clauses or topic–comment frames. Constituents remain continuous, and both the relative order of phrases and the internal structure of each phrase are stable. As a result, significant deviations from the basic word order are ungrammatical, and discourse structure is managed through these specialised constructions rather than through word-order variation.

Noun Phrases

Structure and Order

The internal structure of noun phrases in Yof reveals typologically significant preferences in the ordering of nominal constituents. This includes the position of adjectives, numerals, and possessors relative to the noun, each of which can offer clues to the overall headedness of the language.

Possessive constructions are head-final: the possessor precedes the possessed noun. For example, Yof expresses “the child’s toy” with the equivalent of “child toy”. This ordering is found in many SOV and postpositional languages and aligns with a broader tendency towards modifier-first structures.

jen jikiitis jiwɔilis dilibə̃ːris

[jen jikiːtis jiwɔilis dilibə̃ːris]

jen
2.sing j-
GEN i-
sing kiːt
son -is
def j-
GEN i-
sing wɔil
friend -is
def d-
NOM i-
sing libə̃ːr
book -is
def

“your son’s friend’s book”

 (19)

Case Marking

Yof uses nominative–accusative case marking. The subject of an intransitive verb and the subject of a transitive verb are treated alike and take the nominative case, while the object of a transitive verb is marked with the accusative case. This is the familiar pattern from many European languages: the grammar groups together the participants that function as subjects and marks the participant affected by a transitive action separately.

Disququis tuungw.

[disʔukʷis tuːŋʷ]

d-
NOM i-
sing sʔukʷ
cat -is
def tuː
sleep -ŋʷ
active

“The cat is sleeping.”

 (20)
Disququis ñuungw.

[disʔukʷis ɲuːŋʷ]

d-
NOM i-
sing sʔukʷ
cat -is
def ɲuː
run -ŋʷ
active

“The cat is running.”

 (21)
Disququis qutingw litibibis.

[disʔukʷis ʔutiŋʷ litibibis]

d-
NOM i-
sing sʔukʷ
cat -is
def ʔuti
chase -ŋʷ
active l-
ACC i-
sing tibib
mouse -is
def

“The cat is chasing the mouse.”

 (22)
Disququis was gwongw litibibis.

[disʔukʷis was ɡʷoŋʷ litibibis]

d-
NOM i-
sing sʔukʷ
cat -is
def was
PAST ɡʷo
catch -ŋʷ
active l-
ACC i-
sing tibib
mouse -is
def

“The cat caught the mouse.”

 (23)

Conjunctions

Here is an example of a conjunction.

Difakagwis was ngwingw lupamichis tef lunistokis tef luqaquiijis.

[difakaɡʷis was ŋʷiŋʷ lupamit͡ʃis tef lunistokis tef luʔakʷiːjis]

d-
NOM i-
sing fakaɡʷ
hunter -is
def was
PAST ŋʷi
kill -ŋʷ
active l-
ACC u-
plur pamit͡ʃ
jaguar -is
def tef
and l-
ACC u-
plur nistok
tiger -is
def tef
and l-
ACC u-
plur ʔakʷiːj
lion -is
def

“The hunter killed the jaguars, the tigers and the lions.”

 (24)

Modifiers and Determiners

The ordering of demonstratives, articles (if present), and other modifiers in Yof provides further insight into the structure of the noun phrase. These elements frequently exhibit fixed positions and may reveal whether the language favours head-initial or head-final patterns.

Complex Sentences

Relative Clauses

Yof forms relative clauses by placing the relative clause after the noun it modifies. The clause follows the internal word order of ordinary finite clauses. A dedicated relativising marker introduces the clause and identifies the relationship between the head noun and its role inside the relative clause.

To illustrate how relative clauses work, let us begin with a simple sentence:

Was kiñungw lisququis.

[was kiɲuŋʷ lisʔukʷis]

was
PAST kiɲu
pat -ŋʷ
active l-
ACC i-
sing sʔukʷ
cat -is
def

“I patted the cat.”

 (25)

We can now add a relative clause modifying the noun:

Was kiñungw disququis, daa was gwongw litibibis.

[was kiɲuŋʷ disʔukʷis, daː was ɡʷoŋʷ litibibis]

was
PAST kiɲu
pat -ŋʷ
active d-
NOM i-
sing sʔukʷ
cat -is
def daː
RELPRON was
PAST ɡʷo
catch -ŋʷ
active l-
ACC i-
sing tibib
mouse -is
def

“I patted the cat that caught the mouse.”

 (26)

Relative clauses may themselves contain other relative clauses:

Was kiñungw disququis, daa was gwongw ditibibis, daa was gwangw linigwolis.

[was kiɲuŋʷ disʔukʷis, daː was ɡʷoŋʷ ditibibis, daː was ɡʷaŋʷ liniɡʷolis]

was
PAST kiɲu
pat -ŋʷ
active d-
NOM i-
sing sʔukʷ
cat -is
def daː
RELPRON was
PAST ɡʷo
catch -ŋʷ
active d-
NOM i-
sing tibib
mouse -is
def daː
RELPRON was
PAST ɡʷa
eat -ŋʷ
active l-
ACC i-
sing niɡʷol
cheese -is
def

“I patted the cat that caught the mouse that ate the cheese.”

 (27)

Finally, here is an example containing several layers of embedding:

Was kiñungw disququis, daa was gwongw ditibibis, daa was gwangw dinigwolis, daa was mɔingw daf.

[was kiɲuŋʷ disʔukʷis, daː was ɡʷoŋʷ ditibibis, daː was ɡʷaŋʷ diniɡʷolis, daː was mɔiŋʷ daf]

was
PAST kiɲu
pat -ŋʷ
active d-
NOM i-
sing sʔukʷ
cat -is
def daː
RELPRON was
PAST ɡʷo
catch -ŋʷ
active d-
NOM i-
sing tibib
mouse -is
def daː
RELPRON was
PAST ɡʷa
eat -ŋʷ
active d-
NOM i-
sing niɡʷol
cheese -is
def daː
RELPRON was
PAST mɔi
buy -ŋʷ
active daf
1excl.sing

“I patted the cat that caught the mouse that ate the cheese that I bought.”

 (28)

Complementation Strategies

Yof introduces complement clauses with a dedicated complementiser, similar to English that. The complementiser appears at the beginning of the embedded clause and signals that the clause functions as a syntactic argument. The embedded clause is fully finite and displays the same tense, aspect and agreement patterns as independent clauses.

The following example illustrate how complement clauses function:

Diboogis was pingw mingishis quun liritaitzingw batel was fiheengw migitə̃ːris.

[diboːɡis was piŋʷ miŋiʃis kʷun liritait͡siŋʷ batel was fiheːŋʷ miɡitə̃ːris]

d-
NOM i-
sing boːɡ
boy -is
def was
PAST pi
give -ŋʷ
active m-
DAT i-
sing ŋiʃ
girl -is
def kʷ-
masc un
a l-
ACC i-
sing ritait͡s
apple -iŋʷ
not.def batel
COMP was
PAST fiheː
surprise -ŋʷ
active m-
DAT i-
sing ɡitə̃ːr
teacher -is
def

“It surprised the teacher that the boy had given the girl an apple.”

 (29)

Quotes

Yof expresses quoted or reported speech without a dedicated quotative particle. Quotations appear as ordinary clauses, distinguished only by the surrounding syntactic context or by the use of verbs of speaking.

Here is an example of how quotations are expressed:

Diboogis was songw mingishis daf rongw jen batel.

[diboːɡis was soŋʷ miŋiʃis daf roŋʷ jen batel]

d-
NOM i-
sing boːɡ
boy -is
def was
PAST so
tell -ŋʷ
active m-
DAT i-
sing ŋiʃ
girl -is
def daf
1excl.sing ro
love -ŋʷ
active jen
2.sing batel
COMP

“The boy told the girl that he loved her.”

 (30)

How to cite this grammar

Language Creator. 2026. A Grammar of Yof. Generated by the Language Creator, version 0.92, on 14 August 2026. https://languagecreator.org/grammar/1HNGA

In BibTeX format:

@misc{LC-1HNGA,
  year         = 2026,
  author       = {{Language Creator}},
  title        = {A Grammar of {Yof}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://languagecreator.org/grammar/1HNGA}},
  note         = {Generated by the Language Creator, version 0.92, on 14 August 2026}
}

Supplementary Materials

A collection of illustrative texts and a bilingual dictionary (English–Yof / Yof–English) accompany this grammar. The complete work – comprising the grammar, dictionary and texts – may also be downloaded in ODT or DOCX format.

Readers are encouraged to share observations or corrections via the feedback form. The present page may be accessed directly at:

https://languagecreator.org/grammar/1HNGA

Behind the scenes, the Language Creator stores the generated language in a JSON-based format known as ELD. The corresponding ELD file may be downloaded, edited as required, and reuploaded in order to regenerate the grammar, dictionary and texts.

To revisit the questionnaire settings used to generate this language, .

Language creation took 0.03 seconds; writing the grammar 0.06 seconds.